The High Deserts Social Network Blog…

1955 film based on real AV kidnapping

TRUE EVENTS – “The Night Holds Terror,” released in 1955, was

based on the true kidnapping of an Edwards Air Force Base worker and

his family. Above, the marque sign for the second bill is wrong. The movie’s

name is “Case of the Red Monkey,” referring to a tiny Communist spy.

LANCASTER – A real Antelope

Valley kidnapping provided the

plot for a 1955 movie whose tag-

line was “’l‘hree young, empty-eyed

killers, without mercy or morals,

turn a private home into a house

of horror!”

“The Night Holds Terror,” whose

villains included future “Ben Caseyg

M.D.” television series star Vince

Edwards and future three-time

Oscar nominee John Cassavetes,

tells how Edwards Air Force Base

worker Gene Courtier is kidnapped

and held hostage along with his

wife and two children alter he picks

up a hitchhiken

Much of the black-and-white

movie was shot in the Antelope

Valley; with a lot of scenes of desert

roads and Joshua trees, including

one where Courtiefs kidnappers

force him out of his car and shoot

at him.

They decide against killing him

in favor of holding him and his fam-

ily hustage over the weekend to get

cash for his car, then ultimately try

to ransom him for cash from his

fathen ‘

Besides the scenes ‘of Joshua

trees and Antelope Valley desert,

there’s also a quick glimpse of

the Lancaster railroad station at

Sierra Highway and Lancaster


“The Night Holds Terror” was

the first of two family-held-hos<

tage dramas to be released within

months of each other.

After Columbia released “The

Night Holds ‘lerror,” Paramount re-

leased the bigger-budget “The Des-

perate Hours,” which was based on

an earlier book and starred “Casa-

bianca” star Humphrey Bogart as

the lead villain and Fredric March

as the embattled family man.

` Time magazine in August 1955

said of “The Night Holds Terror”:

“Shot in 18 days on a low budget

($78,000), ‘Night’ was produced,

directed, written and edited by the

husband and wife team of Andrew

and Virginia Stone.

None ofthe cast has a Hollywood

‘name’; most of them came from

TV What emerges is a surprisingly


“The Night Holds Terror” used

the kidnapping victims’ real names

and the real Antelope Valley set-


But the movie fabricated the

whole last half involving the ran-

som attempt, frantic efforts to trace

telephone calls and a last-minute

police rescue. ‘

In reality the robbers left Court-

ier after getting his check for the

car at Stranske Motors in Lan-

caster; he told his story about being

held hostage to Lancaster Sheriffs

Station deputies.

Lancaster detectives decided

to believe Courtier’s story in part

because they were able to find the

empty pistol cartridge at the spot

in the desert where Courtier said a

bullet was fired inches away from

his head, according to a May 26,

1953, Los Angeles Times article

about the start of the trio’s trial.

But it was easy to see why mov-

iemakers picked up on the story,

whose title came from newspaper


The three defendants were ac-

cused not only of kidnapping and

robbing Courtier, the Antelope Val-

ley _Press reported, but of “forcing

his wife, Doris, to dine, dance and

play cards with them all through-

out the night in the Courtiers’


In its June 25, 1953, article

about the three being found guilty

the Antelope Valley Press called

them the “ ‘Night of Terror’ trio.”

Courtier, a 26-year-old North

American Aviation technician,

lived with his 24-year-old wife and

two children in a government home

on Ninth Street at Edwards Air

Force Base. While driving home,

he stopped to pick up hitchhiker

James Canigan, 22, of Los Ange-


A few miles down the road,

Carrigan pulled out a gun, robbed

Courtier of $5 and forced him to

drive off the road, where ex-convict

Leonard Mahan, 24, and AWOL

Camp Pendleton Marine Donald

Hall, 18, pulled up in Mahan’s car.

As in the movie, they decided to

force Courtier to sell his car and

give them the money

They went to Courtier’s Ed-

wards home, where Doris Courtier

was held prisoner by Hall while the

other two took Courtier and his car

to Lancaster.

Courtier got $500 in cash for the

car, but for the remaining $1,251.02

he got a check he oouldn’t cash un-

til the next day, so the kidnappers

‘stayed with him and his family


Mahan made the mistake of get-

ting his car an oil change while the

trio was holding Courtier; deputies

went to the shop and got the ser-

vice record, with the car’s license


While the movie showed the

kidnappers being captured when

police oornered them in their car

in a Los Angeles rainstorm, the

real-life kidnappers were arrested

separately: in Inglewood, in a

downtown Los Angeles hotel and in

a LosAngeles bar.

Turner Classic .Movies peri-

odically shows “The Night Holds

Terror,” as well as “The Desperate

Hours.” ~ °

Compiled by Managing Editor

Charles E Bostwick.

March 15, 2011 Posted by | antelope valley commercial production, antelope valley film office, antelope valley film production, antelope valley filming locations, north la county film production | , , , , | Leave a comment

L.A. off-lot productions up 15%


L.A. off-lot productions up 15%

Gains in Film, TV while commercial sees surge

Off-lot production in the Los Angeles area increased by 15% last year, thanks largely to unexpected fourth-quarter gains in feature production and TV along with a surge in commercials shooting. 

FilmL.A. said California’s tax credit incentive program was responsible for 26% of local feature production for 2010, or 1,400 permitted days, and noted that feature shooting still remains far below the levels of the mid-1990s.

Year-end stats released Tuesday by nonprofit permitting agency FilmL.A. showed 43,646 permitted days in 2010. Feature shoots for the year were up 8.1% to 5,378 days, TV gained 11.9% to 17,833 days, and commercials increased 28% to 6,778.

“Were it not for these projects, 2010 would have been the worst year on record for on-location feature filming in Los Angeles,” the permitting agency said. “As it stands, that record is held by the year 2009, when the features category finished 64% below its historical peak.”

FilmL.A. prexy Paul Audley expressed hope that California’s 2-year-old tax credit incentive program will continue to play a major role in keeping production from leaving the state.

“On balance, the numbers are positive, and I am cautiously optimistic about 2011,” he added. “Hopefully, with FilmL.A.’s new Film Works marketing campaign and the California Film & Television Tax Credit, our state and region will win back entertainment projects and jobs once taken for granted.”

The five-year state program began in July 2009 and made $200 million a year in tax credits for film and TV productions available over the first year and another $100 million in 2010.

Fourth-quarter Film L.A. stats showed a 28% surge to 1,520 days of feature shooting, following a 6.6% decline in the third quarter. Those projects included two that will receive tax credits — “Drive” and “Rampart” — along with “Jack and Jill,” “For the Love of Money,” “The Artist,” “Now” and “Red State.”

Fourth-quarter TV stats shot up 49.9% to 4,832 following an 8.2% decline in the third quarter. TV dramas gained 22.9% while reality rose 89.4.2%, sitcoms more than tripled from 208 to 680 for a 227% gain, and pilots increased 12.6%.

Agency noted that dramas have been shifting onto studio lots, making them untrackable to FilmL.A., while single-camera sitcoms are being shot on area streets.

Commercials gained 2.5% in the fourth quarter following quarterly increases of 60.7%, 34.5% and 21.9%.

“The uptick in numbers clearly reflects the reality that the advertising industry is rebounding nicely from one of its greatest slumps in history,” said Matt Miller, prexy-CEO of the Assn. of Independent Commercial Producers. “Along with the growing need for video content for marketing communications, the models to fulfill these needs continue to shape this segment of the media landscape, and illustrate the importance of this sector as an important economic influencer in Southern California.”

Contact Dave McNary at

February 2, 2011 Posted by | antelope valley commercial production, antelope valley film office, antelope valley film production, antelope valley filming locations, north la county film production | , , , , | Leave a comment

Antelope Valley General Filming Rules

General Filming Rules

Filming Hours – Normal filming hours are from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Any request for filming outside these hours may require a signature survey showing significant support of the requested activity from the affected residents.

Fire – Production companies are responsible for contacting and hiring Fire Safety Advisors/Officers as determined by their permit. The Film Office will submit all permits to the LA County Fire Dept Film Desk for review and determination of the need for Fire Safety Advisors/Officers and water trucks on site during filming.

Gunfire/Firearms – Gunfire or the brandishing of firearms must be identified in the permit request. This activity requires a Sheriff be present to ensure safety and proper notification to appropriate law enforcement offices. Gunfire requires extensive notification beyond the standard 500’ to ensure all those potentially affected by filming are aware of activity. If deemed necessary by the Film Office, a signature survey may be required showing significant support of the requested activity from affected residents.

Inspection – Production must allow inspection of the film site by City staff at any time. A copy of the approved permit must remain at the filming location.

Notification – Notification of residents and/or businesses within 500’ of the filming location and associated activity is required a minimum of two (2) working days in advance of the first filming day. Complicated filming activities may require notification of additional areas to be determined by the Film Office. Notification may be done by Production or if done by the Film Office will be billed to production.

Private Property – Production is required to obtain the property owner’s permission, consent, and/or lease for use of property not owned or controlled by the City. A consent form is available for download. See “Forms”.

Restoration – The permittee shall restore site to the original condition upon completion of shooting unless otherwise approved by the property owner.

Sheriff – Production companies are responsible for contacting and hiring Sheriff Deputies if required by their permit. All Sheriff Deputies have the authority to enforce all filming permits issued within the city limits of the City of Lancaster. They are authorized to enforce, modify or revoke a permit for safety reasons.

Signage – All signs erected for filming purposes will be removed upon completion of filming activity as conditioned by the permit. If not removed within 48 hours, the City will remove them and may levy a fee upon production.

Signature Survey – The Film Office may require a signature survey detailing the proposed filming activity. Production will be responsible for obtaining signatures of affected residents and businesses. The Film Office will provide a signature survey form and a map or list of addresses. A significant majority of those surveyed must not be opposed to the filming for activity to be permitted.

Special Effects – Any filming activity that requires the use of flammable materials, explosive devices or open flames is considered a special effect. The Film Office submits all permit requests directly to the Los Angeles County Fire Department Film Desk for approval of all special effects. Special effects may require extensive notification to residents and businesses beyond the standard 500’ to ensure that all those potentially affected by the activity are notified. If deemed necessary by the Film Office, a signature survey may be required, showing significant support of the requested activity from affected residents.

Special Monitors – When necessary a monitor will be assigned to an individual production at a cost billed to the production company which includes filming that occurs on City-owned property, complicated filming activity, and frequently filmed areas, etc.)


January 20, 2011 Posted by | antelope valley film office, antelope valley film permits, Antelope Valley film regulation, antelope valley filming locations, Antelope valley filming rules | , , , , | Leave a comment